MU‘ĀWIYA’S MONARCHY[1] Waq‘at SiffÄ«n, p.63 (347) as alleging that this empire and caliphate has been laid amongst Quraysh except whom no other one has the eligibility of a caliph. [1] Addressing the dwellers of Medina who hesitated to swear allegiance to YazÄ«d, Rawh Ibn ZinbÄ‘ belonging to the tribe of DjudhÄm and from among the devotees of the Umayya in Damascus said, “We are not soliciting you to swear allegiance to the tribes of Lakhm, DjudhÄm or Kalb, ولكنا ندعوكم الى قريش ومن جعل الله له هذا الأمر واختصّه “We are summoning you toward Quraysh and the one for whom AllÄh has uniquely assigned this authority, namely YazÄ«d Ibn Mu‘Äwiya.†[2] The counterfeit Hadiths prevailing were plentiful among which were “The one disdaining Quraysh has indeed disdained AllÄhâ€. [3] “The formost ImÄms for the nation are the ones from Quraysh.†[4] It is astonishing that to substantiate their nobleness, they availed themselves of their consanguinity with AllÄh’s Apostle(s) [5], though they antagonized his close kins. The Umayya’s Quraysh-oriented policy was manifest in Umayya’s ruthlessness against AnsÄr. Akhtal, an Umayya poet, had composed, “Quraysh is the possessor of the entire virtuousness and greatness whereas contemptability is under the turban of AnsÄr. [6] Enumerating the grounds for his triumph over ‘AlÄ« (a), Mu‘Äwiya referred to his fine relation with Quraysh. [7] Mu‘tazila has indicted Mu‘Äwiya for initiating fatalism in the Islamic world. [8] It can be avowed that faith in fatalism in Arab world has had it’s [1] al-Fitna wa waq‘at al-djamal, p. 109; from: Min dawlat ‘Umar ilÄ dawlat ‘Abd al-Malik, p. 109 (348)
|